"Life speeds and I often feel slow."
- Neil Keatting
OOKEE.com
the geek’s linkblog

You Want To Be President?

|link| You think you can handle the top job? Here’s one (of many) opportunities for you to try, especially if you love reality television.

originally posted by: dugh

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • digg
This entry is filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
 

8 Responses to “You Want To Be President?”

  1. dugh wrote:

    mookee?
    i think you qualify, looking at the eligibility link. do you need a running mate?

  2. skooz the unemployed wrote:

    Damn, makes me wish I was older. I am too young to run for president. Constitution says 35…do any of us qualify yet?

  3. zapski wrote:

    I’m tempted
    I qualify, and I bet I could do worse things to the economy than anyone else! Free Beer Fridays! Topless Tuesdays! (for a select portion of the citizenry, chosen by a committee headed by mookie) It’s all bread and circuses from now on!

  4. dugh wrote:

    bread and circuses!
    that will make you one of the most popular presidents ever! a vote for zapski is like a vote for apple pie, which i would nominate for VP, or at least treasury secretary.

    incidently, i’ll be old enought to qualify. ergh…

  5. odd wrote:

    zapski in ‘04
    sounds like a good platform to me. i’m just a little worried how state dinners might go under his presidency.

  6. dugh wrote:

    indeed, zapski, i am curious if you mean to remedy this disgusting trick you plan to play on visitors to the white house…

  7. Mookee wrote:

    Alas, I am not eligible by a mere 3 months.

    If however, I were eligible, I would not be running just so I could take up my destined position in president zapski’s cabinet. Of course this would require a new Executive Department, but if we can justify Homeland Security, sureless we can justify the Department of Taste (as in, “no, fat people cannot wear spandex leotards and should not be naked, — not as in “wow, this food is really good.”)

    I’m not “married” to the name of the new Dept I’m heading up, so if anyone has any suggestions, I’m listening.

  8. zapski wrote:

    i think we’ll leave the lumps out of the state dinners. at least most of the time. maybe. now off to plan national hooky week (it’s random from month to month)

 

Leave a Reply

« Got Jolt?      Outside the Inbox »