Daniel Radcliffe
Emma Watson
Rupert Grint
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Posted by dugh daren in Celebrity, KillFuckMarry
Related Posts:
Kill, Fuck, Marry
Have You Seen Harry Potter?
Harry Potter and the Underage BJ
Bound Book Date for Harry Potter
Which Harry Potter Character Are You?
This entry is filed under Celebrity, KillFuckMarry. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
10 Responses to “Kill Fuck Marry: Harry Potter Edition”
July 13th, 2007 at 1:45 am
Kill Rupert Grint (for that whining in the Chamber of Secrets)
Fuck Daniel Radcliffe (I mean, come on)
Marry Emma Watson (because she’ll be hot eventually)
July 13th, 2007 at 8:43 am
I’m with DB … though for reasons (not the same). Emma Watson, over the long haul, would be better than some squirrely dude. I’m guessing she’s Hermimy (or however it’s spelled).
July 14th, 2007 at 8:46 pm
Hermione, yes.
July 16th, 2007 at 11:25 am
Ditto with DB and Mookee.
I am surprised at how impossible it was to find anything scandalous on Rupert Grint. No drinking (except in a movie role), no smoking, no drugs, no girls (no guys for that matter), nothing. If you find anything please post!
July 16th, 2007 at 12:04 pm
I can’t imagine, after his squeaking through Chamber of Secrets, he’ll be having any boys or girls anytime soon. Maybe a behind-the-scenes romance will spark with Emma Watson during the filming of HBP, what with their constant heightened sexual tension in the plot. Anyone else nervous to see how they possibly make Ginny a big-screen love interest?
July 16th, 2007 at 2:17 pm
I actually meant Rupert Grint off screen but I suppose it works out on screen, too.
Ginny… They’ve downplayed her a bit too much (as they have a number of the characters who figure into the over all story arch). Depending on what happens in the last book, Neville might be the one they will regret not bringing to the fore the most (though there are still two more movies to go with that).
July 17th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
Not to mention Neville’s rather forceful comeback in 5.
July 23rd, 2007 at 3:18 pm
Okay, folks, I feel like I am a broken record with this. Anyone who has studied film know that 100 pages of novel translate to one hour of film. THUS, with Rowlings books, these movies would have to be hours and hours long to be 100% accurate. Not possible with kids movies, so they HAVE to cut things out. It is a rare director who can translate what’s in the pages to screen pretty faithfully (Perhaps Peter Jackson).
July 24th, 2007 at 5:35 pm
My friend Jon E. thinks they should have made the books into a TV series, so they could hit all of the main plot and subplot points. They could make each book a season. With 24 hours of programming per book/season, he figures the show would be about as faithful as possible, even with the longer books.
July 25th, 2007 at 12:41 pm
Eh, it’d probably go to fox, be screwed by programming lineups, and cancelled 14 episodes in.